Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorReno, Ulises-
dc.creatorRegaldo, Luciana María-
dc.creatorVidal, Eduardo Gabriel-
dc.creatorMariani, Melisa Lourdes-
dc.creatorZalazar, Cristina Susana-
dc.creatorGagneten, Ana María-
dc.date2017-08-28T20:04:18Z-
dc.date2017-08-28T20:04:18Z-
dc.date2016-01-
dc.date2017-08-17T17:43:03Z-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T15:42:07Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-29T15:42:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-
dc.identifierReno, Ulises; Regaldo, Luciana María; Vidal, Eduardo Gabriel; Mariani, Melisa Lourdes; Zalazar, Cristina Susana; et al.; Water polluted with glyphosate formulations: effectiveness of a decontamination process using Chlorella vulgaris growing as bioindicator; Springer; Journal Of Applied Phycology; 28; 4; 1-2016; 2279–2286-
dc.identifier0921-8971-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/23178-
dc.identifierCONICET Digital-
dc.identifierCONICET-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar:8080/jspui/handle/bnmm/299916-
dc.descriptionThe environmental pollution caused by pesticides is considered a major problemworldwide. Glyphosate is one of the herbicides most widely used, and its use hasincreased sharply in the last years. In this work the toxicity of four commercial glyphosate formulations (Eskoba®, Panzer Gold®, Roundup Ultramax® and Sulfosato Touchdown®) was assessed by determining the median effective concentration at 96 h (96 h-EC50) using the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris as the biological model. Although the formulations tested are moderately to slightly toxic to C. vulgaris according to the World Health Organization´s toxicity categories for aquatic and terrestrial organisms, this research shows that the four formulations are toxic, being Eskoba® the least toxic and Roundup Ultramax® the most toxic one. On the other hand, a UV/H2O2 remediation process for the detoxification of the samples was tested. Its effectiveness was evaluated using a C.vulgaris growth inhibition test. Growth inhibition of C. vulgarisdid not reach 18.2 %, indicating the efficacy of the UV/H2O2 remediation process to reduce glyphosate toxicity. In some of the samples tested within the first 48 h of the assay, C. vulgaris growth was even encouraged. The results of the present work suggest that the selected species was a good indicator to determine glyphosate formulations toxicity level, and shows the relevance of the ecotoxicological tests to evaluate a physicochemical remediation process.-
dc.descriptionFil: Reno, Ulises. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Departamento de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Regaldo, Luciana María. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Departamento de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Vidal, Eduardo Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Mariani, Melisa Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Zalazar, Cristina Susana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Gagneten, Ana María. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Departamento de Ciencias Naturales; Argentina-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0755-6-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10811-015-0755-6-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/-
dc.sourcereponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)-
dc.sourceinstname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-
dc.sourceinstacron:CONICET-
dc.source.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/41474-
dc.subjectTRATAMIENTO-
dc.subjectEFLUENTES-
dc.subjectOXIDACION-
dc.subjectTOXICIDAD-
dc.subjectIngeniería Oceanográfica-
dc.subjectIngeniería del Medio Ambiente-
dc.subjectINGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS-
dc.titleWater polluted with glyphosate formulations: effectiveness of a decontamination process using Chlorella vulgaris growing as bioindicator-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/articulo-
Aparece en las colecciones: CONICET

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.