Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorChiaradia, Nicolas Mariano-
dc.creatorCardoni, Daniel Augusto-
dc.creatorPretelli, Matías Guillermo-
dc.creatorIsacch, Juan Pablo-
dc.date2018-11-09T18:37:37Z-
dc.date2018-11-09T18:37:37Z-
dc.date2017-03-
dc.date2018-10-23T14:08:23Z-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T15:42:27Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-29T15:42:27Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-
dc.identifierChiaradia, Nicolas Mariano; Cardoni, Daniel Augusto; Pretelli, Matías Guillermo; Isacch, Juan Pablo; Breeding biology of the Wren-like Rushbird (Phleocryptes melanops) in the southeast Pampas of Argentina; Wilson Ornithological Society; Wilson Journal of Ornithology; 129; 1; 3-2017; 46-52-
dc.identifier1559-4491-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/64115-
dc.identifier1938-5447-
dc.identifierCONICET Digital-
dc.identifierCONICET-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar:8080/jspui/handle/bnmm/300040-
dc.descriptionBetween 2013-2015, we conducted a study on the breeding biology of the Wren-like Rushbird (Phleocryptes melanops) in wetlands of the Pampas region, Argentina. The search for rushbird nests was conducted by several researchers walking into the wetlands, in three ways: by observing adults carrying material, through singing adults next to the nest or from the active search for nests in the vegetation. Nests were visited at intervals of 3-5 days. Of the 245 nests that we encountered (153 nests in 2013-2014 and 92 nests in 2014-2015), we found eggs in 97. The egg-laying period lasted almost 3 months (late Sept-late Dec). The mean clutch size was 2.7 ± 0.5 eggs (mean ± SD) (range = 1-3; n = 63), and the total nesting period was 34 ± 2.5 days (mean ± SD), with incubation and chick-rearing periods of 18 ± 1.63 days and 16 ± 0.50 days, respectively. From the total number of nests found, 43% of them were abandoned during building, 38% of nests were depredated, 14% of nests (n = 33) were successful, while 5% of nests were destroyed. Nest predation was higher during the incubation (80%) than during chick-rearing period (20%). The nesting success was on average of 23% (25% for the 2013-14 and 21% for the 2014-2015) for the entire nesting period. We also observed relatively higher plasticity than previously reported in relationship to vegetation used to fix nests (80% rushes, 20% other plants). Finally, we observed an abrupt termination of the reproductive period after desiccation of the wetlands; 90% of active nests failed (75% depredated and 25% abandoned) when the wetland was dried.-
dc.descriptionFil: Chiaradia, Nicolas Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Cardoni, Daniel Augusto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Pretelli, Matías Guillermo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Isacch, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWilson Ornithological Society-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1676/1559-4491-129.1.46-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.1676/1559-4491-129.1.46-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/-
dc.sourcereponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)-
dc.sourceinstname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-
dc.sourceinstacron:CONICET-
dc.subjectBREEDING SUCCESS-
dc.subjectFURNARIID-
dc.subjectNEST STRUCTURE-
dc.subjectREPRODUCTIVE PHENOLOGY-
dc.subjectRUSHES-
dc.subjectWETLANDS-
dc.subjectOtras Ciencias Biológicas-
dc.subjectCiencias Biológicas-
dc.subjectCIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS-
dc.titleBreeding biology of the Wren-like Rushbird (Phleocryptes melanops) in the southeast Pampas of Argentina-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/articulo-
Aparece en las colecciones: CONICET

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.