1. RODNA
  2. CONICET
  3. CONICET
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorMoles, Angela-
dc.creatorFlores Moreno, Habacuc-
dc.creatorBonser, Stephen P.-
dc.creatorWarton, David I.-
dc.creatorHelm, Aveliina-
dc.creatorEldridge, David J.-
dc.creatorJurado, Enrique-
dc.creatorHemmings, Frank A.-
dc.creatorReich, Peter B.-
dc.creatorCavender Bares, Jeannine-
dc.creatorSeabloom, Eric W.-
dc.creatorMayfield, Margaret M.-
dc.creatorSheil, Douglas-
dc.creatorDjietror, Jonathan C.-
dc.creatorPeri, Pablo Luis-
dc.creatorEnrico, Lucas-
dc.creatorCabido, Marcelo Ruben-
dc.creatorSetterfield, Samantha-
dc.creatorLehman, Caroline-
dc.creatorThomson, Fiona-
dc.date2017-04-26T19:42:35Z-
dc.date2017-04-26T19:42:35Z-
dc.date2012-01-
dc.date2017-04-12T17:58:44Z-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T15:43:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-29T15:43:32Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-26T19:42:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-26T19:42:35Z-
dc.date.issued2012-01-
dc.date.issued2017-04-12T17:58:44Z-
dc.identifierMoles, Angela; Flores Moreno, Habacuc; Bonser, Stephen P.; Warton, David I.; Helm, Aveliina; et al.; Invasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea; Wiley; Journal Of Ecology; 100; 1-2012; 116-127-
dc.identifier0022-0477-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/15765-
dc.identifier1365-2745-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar:8080/jspui/handle/bnmm/300397-
dc.descriptionWe provide a brief overview of progress in our understanding of introduced plant species. Three main conclusions emerge from our review: (i) Many lines of research, including the search for traits that make species good invaders, or that make ecosystems susceptible to invasion, are yielding idiosyncratic results. To move forward, we advocate a more synthetic approach that incorporates a range of different types of information about the introduced species and the communities and habitats they are invading. (ii) Given the growing evidence for the adaptive capacity of both introduced species and recipient communities, we need to consider the implications of the long-term presence of introduced species in our ecosystems. (iii) Several foundational ideas in invasion biology have become widely accepted without appropriate testing, or despite equivocal evidence from empirical tests. One such idea is the suggestion that disturbance facilitates invasion. We use data from 200 sites around the world to provide a broad test of the hypothesis that invasions are better predicted by a change in disturbance regime than by disturbance per se. Neither disturbance nor change in disturbance regime explained more than 7% of the variation in the % of cover or species richness contributed by introduced species. However, change in disturbance regime was a significantly better predictor than was disturbance per se, explaining approximately twice as much variation as did disturbance.-
dc.descriptionFil: Moles, Angela. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Flores Moreno, Habacuc. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Bonser, Stephen P.. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Warton, David I.. The University of New South Wales. School of Mathematics and Statistics and Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Helm, Aveliina. University of Tartu. Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences; Estonia-
dc.descriptionFil: Eldridge, David J.. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Jurado, Enrique. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. School of Forest Sciences; México-
dc.descriptionFil: Hemmings, Frank A.. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Reich, Peter B.. University of Minnesota. Department of Forest Resources; Estados Unidos-
dc.descriptionFil: Cavender Bares, Jeannine. University of Minnesota. Evolution and Behavior, Department of Ecology; Estados Unidos-
dc.descriptionFil: Seabloom, Eric W.. University of Minnesota. Evolution and Behavior. Department of Ecology,; Estados Unidos-
dc.descriptionFil: Mayfield, Margaret M.. The University of Queensland. School of Biological Sciences; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Sheil, Douglas. Mbarara University of Science and Technology. Institute for Tropical Forest Conservation; Uganda. Center for International Forestry Research; Indonesia. Southern Cross University. School of Environmental Science and Management; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Djietror, Jonathan C.. Hokkaido University. Graduate School of Environmental Science. Laboratory of Ecological Genetics; Japón-
dc.descriptionFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Enrico, Lucas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Cabido, Marcelo Ruben. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Setterfield, Samantha. Charles Darwin University. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihood; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Lehman, Caroline. Macquarie University. Department of Biological Sciences; Australia-
dc.descriptionFil: Thomson, Fiona. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01915.x/full-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01915.x-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/-
dc.sourcereponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)-
dc.sourceinstname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-
dc.sourceinstacron:CONICET-
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INVASION-
dc.subjectDISTURBANCE-
dc.subjectEVOLUTION IN INTRODUCED SPECIES-
dc.subjectGRAZING-
dc.subjectEcología-
dc.subjectCiencias Biológicas-
dc.subjectCIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS-
dc.titleInvasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/articulo-
Aparece en las colecciones: CONICET

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem