Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorIsla, Maria Ines-
dc.creatorSalas, Ana Lilia-
dc.creatorDanert, Fátima Carolina-
dc.creatorZampini, Iris Catiana-
dc.creatorOrdóñez, Roxana Mabel-
dc.date2016-08-02T18:41:57Z-
dc.date2016-08-02T18:41:57Z-
dc.date2014-02-07-
dc.date2016-07-25T19:31:59Z-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T15:56:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-29T15:56:48Z-
dc.identifierIsla, Maria Ines; Salas, Ana Lilia; Danert, Fátima Carolina; Zampini, Iris Catiana; Ordóñez, Roxana Mabel; Analytical methodology optimization to estimate the content of non-flavonoid phenolic compounds in Argentine propolis extracts; Taylor & Francis; Pharmaceutical Biology; 52; 7; 7-2-2014; 835-840-
dc.identifier1388-0209-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/6872-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar:8080/jspui/handle/bnmm/305946-
dc.descriptionContext: Traditionally, the content of total phenolics (flavonoid phenolics (FP) and nonflavonoid phenolics (NFP)) and flavonoids (flavone/flavonol and flavonone/dihydroflavonol)in propolis has been determined by different methodologies. Until now, the percentage of total phenolic (TP) compounds that corresponds to FP and NFP, expressed in the same units by a spectrophotometric method, has not been determined. Objective: The current study proposes a quick and simple methodology that separates FP and NFP in propolis samples and determines TP, FP, and NFP by the same method. Materials and methods: Propolis samples from five Argentine provinces (Tucuma´n, Santiago del Estero, Salta, Misiones, and Jujuy) were used. Extraction of TP from the propolis samples was carried out by maceration with 80% ethanol and quantified by Folin?Ciocalteu reagent (FC-R). Then, FP was precipitated with formaldehyde in acid medium. After centrifugation, NFP were determined in the supernatant using FC-R. FP content was calculated as the difference between the content of TP and NFP. The method was also validated using commercial flavonoids and chalcones. Results: FP recovery in all experiments was between 85.95% and 98.29%. Propolis from Tucuman had significantly higher amounts of total phenols than propolis from other provinces. SE5 showed higher content of FP (81.52%) followed by SA1 (74.75%). The propolis from TUC4, SA4, SE3, and MI showed the lowest FP content and highest content of NFP. Conclusions: This method provides a simple, reliable, and specific spectrophotometric assay to estimate the content of NFP, FP, and TP in propolis samples.-
dc.descriptionFil: Isla, Maria Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Salas, Ana Lilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Danert, Fátima Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Zampini, Iris Catiana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Ordóñez, Roxana Mabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.871638-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3109/13880209.2013.871638-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/24920228-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13880209.2013.871638?journalCode=iphb20#.V6CoT2VXui4-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/-
dc.sourcereponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)-
dc.sourceinstname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-
dc.sourceinstacron:CONICET-
dc.subjectPROPOLIS-
dc.subjectFLAVONOID PHENOLIC PRECIPITATION-
dc.subjectTOTAL PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS CONTENT-
dc.subjectDETERMINATION OF PHENOLIC NON FLAVONOIDES-
dc.subjectQuímica Orgánica-
dc.subjectCiencias Químicas-
dc.subjectCIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS-
dc.titleAnalytical methodology optimization to estimate the content of non-flavonoid phenolic compounds in Argentine propolis extracts-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/articulo-
Aparece en las colecciones: CONICET

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.