Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.provenanceUniversidad Nacional de Río Negro-
dc.creatorLevin, Luciano G.-
dc.creatorJensen, Pablo-
dc.creatorKreimer, Pablo R.-
dc.date2016-12-16-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T14:09:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-11T14:09:13Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-16-
dc.identifierLevin, Luciano G., Jensen, Pablo & Kreimer, Pablo R. (2016). Does Size Matter? The Multipolar International Landscape of Nanoscience. Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 12; 1-12-
dc.identifier1932-6203-
dc.identifierhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166914-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/44247-
dc.identifierhttps://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/handle/20.500.12049/2868-
dc.identifierhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166914-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar/jspui/handle/bnmm/575836-
dc.descriptionFil: Levin, Luciano G. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Instituto de Estudios Sociohistóricos; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Levin, Luciano G. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Jensen, Pablo. École normale supérieure de Lyon; Francia-
dc.descriptionFil: Kreimer, Pablo R. Universidad Maimónides; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Kreimer, Pablo R. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina-
dc.descriptionHow do different countries tackle nanoscience research? Are all countries similar except for a trivial size effect, as science is often assumed to be universal? Or does size dictate large differences, as large countries are able to develop activities in all directions of research, while small countries have to specialize in some specific niches? Alternatively, is size irrelevant, as all countries have followed different historical paths, leading to different patterns of specialisation? Here, we develop an original method that uses a bottom-up definition of scientific subfields to map the international structure of any scientific field. Our analysis shows that nanoscience research does not show a universal pattern of specialisation, homothetic of that of a single global leader (e.g., the United States). Instead, we find a multipolar world, with four main ways of doing nanosciences.-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation11-
dc.relationPlos One-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/-
dc.sourcereponame:RID-UNRN (UNRN)-
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Nacional de Río Negro-
dc.sourceinstacron:UNRN-
dc.source.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166914-
dc.subjectSociologia de la Ciencia-
dc.subjectPolítica Científica-
dc.subjectNueva Disciplinariedad-
dc.subject.::Ciencias Sociales::Sociología-
dc.titleDoes Size Matter? The Multipolar International Landscape of Nanoscience-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/articulo-
dc.about-
Aparece en las colecciones: Universidad Nacional de Río Negro

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.